<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>It tastes like burning &#187; IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cdavis.us/category/it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cdavis.us</link>
	<description>Ramblings from someone who really doesn&#039;t have much to say</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:09:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>edwalt&#8217;s: If I cannot remote, there is no hope&#8230;. right?</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2006/08/29/edwalts-if-i-cannot-remote-there-is-no-hope-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2006/08/29/edwalts-if-i-cannot-remote-there-is-no-hope-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rdp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdavis.us/2006/08/29/edwalts-if-i-cannot-remote-there-is-no-hope-right/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[edwalt&#8217;s &#8211; Things I Wish I&#8217;d known about Small Business Server&#8230;&#8230; : If I cannot remote, there is no hope&#8230;. right? Here&#8217;s the scenario; I am the Network Administrator and for whatever reason the remote desktop option has been disabled &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2006/08/29/edwalts-if-i-cannot-remote-there-is-no-hope-right/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/edwalt/archive/2006/08/29/452542.aspx">edwalt&#8217;s &#8211; Things I Wish I&#8217;d known about Small Business Server&#8230;&#8230; : If I cannot remote, there is no hope&#8230;. right?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Here&#8217;s the scenario;  I am the Network Administrator and for whatever reason the remote desktop option has been disabled on the XP client I am trying to reach.  It worked fine a couple of days ago, however I cannot connect to the client now.  Is it possible to connect to a client machine remotely &#8211; even if the remote desktop option is disabled on the XP client?</p>
<p>The answer to this is yes&#8230;. as long as you have the rights to do so.</p>
<p>So how do you do it.</p>
<ol>
<li>Open Regedit on the server.</li>
<li>Select File &#8211; Connect Network registry</li>
<li>Enter the name of the client machine and select &#8220;Check Name&#8221;</li>
<li>At the bottom of your servers registry tree you will know see 2 hives appear.</li>
<ul>
<li>The Hkey_Local_Machine and the Hkey_Users under the clients computer name.</li>
</ul>
<li>Goto  hklm\system\currentcontrolset\control\terminal server\FdenyTSConnection=1</li>
<li>Change the FdenyTSConnection to 0</li>
<li>Attempt to logon on again</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>[via: <a target="_blank" href="http://kevindevin.com/?p=2336">In The Trenches</a>]</p>
<blockquote />
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2003/06/03/waste-high-in-vpn-setups/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Waste high in VPN setups">Waste high in VPN setups</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2003/10/31/thats-umpossible/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: That&#8217;s umpossible?">That&#8217;s umpossible?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2007/12/04/links-for-2007-12-04/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: links for 2007-12-04">links for 2007-12-04</a></li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2006/08/29/edwalts-if-i-cannot-remote-there-is-no-hope-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>XP and only one wireless access point</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2006/07/11/xp-and-only-one-wireless-access-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2006/07/11/xp-and-only-one-wireless-access-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdavis.us/2006/07/11/xp-and-only-one-wireless-access-point/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iâ€™m looking help from the blogoshpere for a way to have XP only connect to my wireless access point. I do not want the user to have the ability to see other available wireless networks and more importantly I donâ€™t &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2006/07/11/xp-and-only-one-wireless-access-point/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Iâ€™m looking help from the blogoshpere for a way to have XP only connect to my wireless access point.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I do not want the user to have the ability to see other available wireless networks and more importantly I donâ€™t want them to have the ability to connect to wireless networks other than the one I configured XP with.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Scenerio: The computers are part of the management offices of apartment complexes. We will have 1 wireless router and 3-5 computers per location. Being that these are apartments, there are usually quite a few open access points within reach of the leasing office. And somehow my users are getting associated to these â€˜otherâ€™ wireless networks. My biggest support issues right now are them calling up saying they cannot print anymore to a printer in the office and I find out they are connected to â€˜linksysâ€™ instead of the one they are suppose to be. I simply have them re-connect to the office WIFI and remove the rogue AP from the preferred list to get them back on their network.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">For the record, the â€˜Automatically connect to non-preferred networksâ€™ is not checked.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">What Iâ€™ve tried: If I stop the WZC service after the computer boots up, that prevents the â€˜view availableâ€™ functionality, which is good and allows for continued use on their wireless network, but if I disable the service completely, wireless networking does not work at all upon reboot.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">How can I make XP only work with just one access point?</p>
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2003/06/23/the-wireless-void-that-is-central-wisconsin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: The wireless void that is central Wisconsin">The wireless void that is central Wisconsin</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/09/10/have-to-send-my-laptop-in-for-repairagain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Have to send my laptop in for repair&#8230;again">Have to send my laptop in for repair&#8230;again</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2003/02/24/how-about-this/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: How about this">How about this</a></li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2006/07/11/xp-and-only-one-wireless-access-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anyone know what software this is?</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2005/03/01/anyone-know-what-software-this-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2005/03/01/anyone-know-what-software-this-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 20:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cdavis.us/2005/03/01/anyone-know-what-software-this-is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been looking for a nice looking, easy to use knowledge base software package. I came across the website for the help desk of the University of Wisconsin and really like the looks of their knowledgebase. Does anyone know what &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2005/03/01/anyone-know-what-software-this-is/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for a nice looking, easy to use knowledge base software package. I came across the <a href="http://helpdesk.wisc.edu/">website for the help desk of the University of Wisconsin</a> and really like the looks of their knowledgebase.</p>
<p>Does anyone know what software it is? I suppose it could be written in house but just thought I&#8217;d ask. I&#8217;ve emailed them asking the question, but I haven&#8217;t yet gotten any response.</p>
<p><a href="http://helpdesk.wisc.edu/"><img src="http://www.cdavis.us/photos/albums/album10/aan.jpg" alt="UW Helpdesk" /></a></p>
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2007/06/15/looking-for-system-imaging-software/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Looking for system imaging software, with a catch">Looking for system imaging software, with a catch</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2006/01/04/software-for-starving-students-200601-released/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Software for Starving Students 2006.01 Released">Software for Starving Students 2006.01 Released</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/10/12/trying-to-use-an-aggregator/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Trying to use an aggregator">Trying to use an aggregator</a></li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2005/03/01/anyone-know-what-software-this-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hopefully no more wiki spam</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2005/02/02/hopefully-no-more-wiki-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2005/02/02/hopefully-no-more-wiki-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My wiki has been the target of spam recently. Yesterday when I went to it, the content of the main page was gone and was replaced by spam links. One of the nice things about wiki&#8217;s is was easy to &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2005/02/02/hopefully-no-more-wiki-spam/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/wiki/">wiki</a> has been the target of spam recently. Yesterday when I went to it, the content of the main page was gone and was replaced by spam links. One of the nice things about wiki&#8217;s is was easy to revert to the original page.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t figure out how this was happening. I disabled anonymous editing, yet pages were still being modified. I finally did a little research last night and found out that the spam bots were actually creating wiki accounts and then modifying pages under an account. Since my wiki is strictly for my own use(at least for editing), I don&#8217;t need users accounts at all. So after a little more research, I found a line that I could add to the configuration file that only allows admins to create user accounts. I&#8217;ve instituted that and it does remove the user creation form from everyones view. Now I just hope it works</p>
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/05/19/coincidence/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Coincidence???">Coincidence???</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2006/04/25/links-for-2006-04-25/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: links for 2006-04-25">links for 2006-04-25</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2006/07/17/gmail-spam-filters-stink-today/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Gmail spam filters stink today">Gmail spam filters stink today</a></li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2005/02/02/hopefully-no-more-wiki-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was my site down all day or not?</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2005/01/16/was-my-site-down-all-day-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2005/01/16/was-my-site-down-all-day-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2005 22:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was not able to get here or any of my sites at all today. I couldn&#8217;t even SSH in. I was thinking it may be a DNS issue, so I logged in remotely to another computer system at work &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2005/01/16/was-my-site-down-all-day-or-not/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not able to get here or any of my sites at all today. I couldn&#8217;t even SSH in. I was thinking it may be a DNS issue, so I logged in remotely to another computer system at work and tried to communicate to the Linux server via the internal network and I got no responses.</p>
<p>So I assumed the computer had some kind of issue, maybe hard locked or maybe completely lost power. I had to wait until my wife got home from work so I could go to the office and find out what was going on.</p>
<p>On the way to work, I was only thinking about how I don&#8217;t have recent backups and what if the machine is hosed. I was getting nervous.</p>
<p>When I got there, not only was the machine running, it seemed to have no problems what so ever. It was communicating to the Internet just fine. Just for kicks, I rebooted the server and our Internet router.</p>
<p>After it came back up, I was able to get to this site, so I checked out the refer logs, and it states that the site has been getting hits all day long. So what really was the problem?? Maybe just something with roadrunner DNS?? Why couldn&#8217;t I ping it from a machine that was on the internal network?</p>
<p>I have no idea, I&#8217;m just glad it&#8217;s back available to me. Now it&#8217;s time formulate a better backup plan.</p>
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2003/11/20/magnatune-a-shareware-music-site/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Magnatune &#8211; A Shareware Music Site">Magnatune &#8211; A Shareware Music Site</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/01/27/site-will-be-down-this-afternoon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Site will be down this afternoon">Site will be down this afternoon</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/12/20/site-of-the-day-ping-o-matic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Site of the day: Ping-o-Matic">Site of the day: Ping-o-Matic</a></li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2005/01/16/was-my-site-down-all-day-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quickbooks in a Terminal Server environment</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/24/quickbooks-in-a-terminal-server-environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/24/quickbooks-in-a-terminal-server-environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I had the task of setting up an extremely limited access user to be able to run QuickBooks(and QuickBooks only) through a terminal server session. I headed to the QuickBooks support site to see if there were any initial &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/24/quickbooks-in-a-terminal-server-environment/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, I had the task of setting up an extremely limited access user to be able to run QuickBooks(and QuickBooks only) through a terminal server session.</p>
<p>I headed to the QuickBooks support site to see if there were any initial pointers before I embarked on this journey. Only to find that QuickBooks basic, pro, and premier are not supported in terminal services, but their enterprise version(starting at $3,500) is. The version I was working with was Premier, so I knew I wasn&#8217;t going to get any help from Intuit.</p>
<p>Starting with <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/?id=278295">this KB Article</a>, I created a special <abbr title="Organizational Unit">OU</abbr> where these users are going to be placed and modified group policies to prevent access to just about everything. Then setup redirected desktop and start menu folders.</p>
<p>I logged in as a test user to verify my settings, and everything looked good, except there was a Microsoft Outlook icon on the desktop. So I found <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/?id=321777">this KB Article</a> and was able to remove it globally from the system. The article talks about renaming the registry key, I tried that first, but it didn&#8217;t work, so I just deleted it. Then wammo, no more icon. Everything was looking great.</p>
<p>So then for the finally, I obviously need to launch QuickBooks and verify that it works. And right away I&#8217;m hit with an error message, telling me that my limited user access is preventing QuickBooks from running.</p>
<p>Back the internet. I didn&#8217;t find much info searching the web so I searched the newsgroups where I found <a href="http://hem.fyristorg.com/vera/IT/TS_apps_QB.htm">this site</a>. After looking at the instructions on that site I knew I wasn&#8217;t going to reinstall QuickBooks, so I started following it at the registry changes. A quick test, and sure enough, everything was working perfectly.</p>
<p>Thank you Internet! I was able to have this completely working in about 2 hourï¿½s time including all the different researching I did. Maybe these links will be of value to someone else down the road, which is why I made this entry.</p>
<p><b>Article links:</b><br />
<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/?id=278295">How to lock down a Windows 2000 Terminal Server session</a><br />
<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/?id=321777">How to remove the Outlook icon from your desktop</a><br />
<a href="http://hem.fyristorg.com/vera/IT/TS_apps_QB.htm">Changes nesescary to make Quickbooks work in a terminal session</a><br />
<a href="http://www.weeurl.com/09veUX">Intuits official stance on their products running on a terminal server</a></p>
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/05/18/up-to-my-eye-sockets-in-group-policies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Up to my eye sockets in Group Policies">Up to my eye sockets in Group Policies</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2005/03/25/cool-stuff-transparent-screens/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Cool Stuff: Transparent Screens">Cool Stuff: Transparent Screens</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2006/08/29/edwalts-if-i-cannot-remote-there-is-no-hope-right/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: edwalt&#8217;s: If I cannot remote, there is no hope&#8230;. right?">edwalt&#8217;s: If I cannot remote, there is no hope&#8230;. right?</a></li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/24/quickbooks-in-a-terminal-server-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slipstreaming away</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/11/slipstreaming-away/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/11/slipstreaming-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished creating a new Windows XP CD with SP2 built in to it. It&#8217;s very easy to, I just followed this guide that Neowin has on it&#8217;s site. Slipstream SP2 into Windows XP ---Related Articles at It tastes &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/11/slipstreaming-away/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished creating a new Windows XP CD with SP2 built in to it. It&#8217;s very easy to, I just followed this guide that <a href="http://www.neowin.net/">Neowin</a> has on it&#8217;s site.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.neowin.net/articles.php?action=more&#038;id=94">Slipstream SP2 into Windows XP</a></p>
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li>No related posts</li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/11/slipstreaming-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet another outage</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/02/yet-another-outage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/02/yet-another-outage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 15:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, our office experienced another power fluctuation today. As a result both our main server and the Linux server lost power. Pretty obvious that the UPS that those two systems are on is basically useless. We swapped out the useless, &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/02/yet-another-outage/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, our office experienced another power fluctuation today. As a result both our main server and the Linux server lost power. Pretty obvious that the UPS that those two systems are on is basically useless.</p>
<p>We swapped out the useless, inadequate UPS with a brand new inadequate one. It&#8217;s ok though, I&#8217;ve been given word that we&#8217;ll be ordering a nice SmartUPS from APC this week.</p>
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/02/fixed-the-problem-with-the-server/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Fixed the problem with the server">Fixed the problem with the server</a></li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/02/yet-another-outage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixed the problem with the server</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/02/fixed-the-problem-with-the-server/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/02/fixed-the-problem-with-the-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 08:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you were visiting over the weekend(or at least trying to), the site was extremely sluggish. It wasn&#8217;t just this site but every site on the server. Well, sometime early Saturday morning our office experienced a power outage. Long &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/02/fixed-the-problem-with-the-server/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you were visiting over the weekend(or at least trying to), the site was extremely sluggish. It wasn&#8217;t just this site but every site on the server. Well, sometime early Saturday morning our office experienced a power outage. Long enough to run the UPS&#8217;s dry. Someone at the office called me and told me what I already knew. I had them power the Linux server back up. It was up but something was still wrong.</p>
<p>Well, long story short, a couple of weeks ago we made some updates to our network, including a whole new IP schema. The Linux server was updated, but during the reboot it reverted back to the old IP addresses.</p>
<p>When I got in this morning, I corrected the IP settings, and now we&#8217;re back in business.</p>
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/10/18/question-to-other-it-folks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Question to other IT folks&#8230;">Question to other IT folks&#8230;</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2005/06/06/more-tedious-work-complete/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: More tedious work complete">More tedious work complete</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2003/04/30/persistence-pays-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Persistence pays off.">Persistence pays off.</a></li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/08/02/fixed-the-problem-with-the-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another reason to hate HTML email</title>
		<link>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/07/27/another-reason-to-hate-html-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/07/27/another-reason-to-hate-html-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one may be specific to OL2003, but I hate the fact that you actually have to open the message up to print it. Why?????????? ---Related Articles at It tastes like burning:Free BOO-rito on Oct 31st at ChipoltesNotifications of comments &#8230; <a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/07/27/another-reason-to-hate-html-email/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one may be specific to OL2003, but I hate the fact that you actually have to open the message up to print it. Why??????????</p>
<p>---<br />Related Articles at It tastes like burning:<ul><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2006/10/27/free-boo-rito-on-oct-31st-at-chipoltes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Free BOO-rito on Oct 31st at Chipoltes">Free BOO-rito on Oct 31st at Chipoltes</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2003/02/20/notifications-of-comments-now-functional/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Notifications of comments now functional">Notifications of comments now functional</a></li><li><a href="http://www.cdavis.us/2004/06/25/so-does-everyone-have-a-gmail-account-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: So does everyone have a gmail account now?">So does everyone have a gmail account now?</a></li></ul></p><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cdavis.us/2004/07/27/another-reason-to-hate-html-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

